Turkey (Türkçe)
Germany (German)
Worldwide (English)
One of the most critical questions that arise when assembling a computer or setting up a new system is: Should I choose AMD Ryzen or Intel? In this article, we will examine the features of both processor brands, their advantages and disadvantages for different use cases, price/performance charts, recommended models, and sector-based preferences in detail.
General Information About Ryzen and Intel
| Feature | AMD Ryzen | Intel |
|---|---|---|
| Release Year | 2017 (Zen architecture) | 1971 (first Processor 4004) |
| Technology | Zen 4/Zen 5 architecture (2025) | Raptor Lake/Arrow Lake architecture |
| Core/Thread Counts | High core/thread count (6-64) | Generally lower (4-24) |
| Price/Performance | Very high | More expensive but stable |
| Processor Graphics (iGPU) | Available in select models | iGPU integrated in most models |
Performance Comparison (with 2025 Data)
| Category | AMD Ryzen | Intel |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Core Performance | 95% | 100% |
| Multi-Core Performance | 105% | 95% |
| Price/Performance Ratio | 110% | 85% |
| Heat and Energy Consumption | Less | Slightly more |
| Overclocking | More flexible | Only in "K" series |
| Gaming Performance | Very good (minimal difference) | Slightly ahead |
| Professional Rendering | Ahead | Behind |
Ryzen and Intel Selection According to Usage Areas
Gaming
-
Intel is generally slightly more advantageous, especially at high FPS targets like 1080p and 144Hz, as it offers higher single-core performance.
-
Ryzen, on the other hand, goes head-to-head with Intel in modern multi-core supported games and provides a price advantage.
Work and Professional Use (Workstation)
-
Ryzen is clearly ahead in multi-core operations such as video editing, 3D modeling, and rendering, especially with the 7000 series and Threadripper models.
Daily Use and Office Computers
-
Intel offers low-power, iGPU-integrated economic systems with the i3/i5 series.
-
Ryzen 5 5600G or 7600G models, on the other hand, provide extremely sufficient performance via integrated graphics.
Server and Data Center Usage
-
The Ryzen Epyc series is heavily used in data centers.
-
The Intel Xeon series is preferred for critical operations and stability-oriented areas.
Preferences for Different Sectors
| Sector | Recommended Brand | Model Recommendations |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming and Broadcasting | Intel / Ryzen | Intel i7-14700K, Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| 3D Modeling / Rendering | Ryzen | Ryzen 9 7950X, Threadripper 7975WX |
| Software Development | Ryzen | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| Video Editing | Ryzen | Ryzen 9 7900X |
| Office and Daily Tasks | Intel | Intel i5-14400 |
| Data Center | Ryzen / Intel | Ryzen EPYC 9654, Intel Xeon Platinum |
Price/Performance Recommendations (2025)
| Budget | Ryzen Recommendation | Intel Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Low Budget | Ryzen 5 5500 | Intel i3-14100 |
| Mid-Range | Ryzen 5 7600 | Intel i5-14600K |
| High Performance | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Intel i7-14700K |
| High-End Professional | Ryzen 9 7950X | Intel i9-14900K |
Pros and Cons for Ryzen
Pros:
-
More cores/threads
-
Strong price/performance ratio
-
Advanced overclocking capabilities
Cons:
-
May lag behind Intel by 2-3% in e-sports games that demand very high FPS
Pros and Cons for Intel
Pros:
-
Very high single-core performance, especially in games
-
Integrated graphics unit in most models
Cons:
-
Overclocking is only supported in "K" series
-
Generally more expensive
Conclusion
-
Those who want high multi-processing performance (Rendering, Video Editing, Software) should very clearly turn to AMD Ryzen.
-
Those who want pure gaming performance and low-latency systems (e-Sports, FPS games) can prefer Intel.
-
In budget-friendly, balanced systems, the price/performance balance offered by Ryzen should not be ignored.
When making the final decision, you should also consider your intended use and future upgrade plans.