Turkey (Turkish)
Germany (German)
Worldwide (English)
Trusted Access for Cyber is the governance and access layer for OpenAI Daybreak.
Halkali merkez neighborhood fatih st ozgur apt no 46 , Kucukcekmece , Istanbul , 34303 , TR
OpenAI Trusted Access for Cyber, now presented as Daybreak Access, is an access and governance model designed to help verified organizations and cybersecurity teams use advanced cyber capabilities for authorized security work. The enterprise application is more than a form: organization identity, intended use, security controls, employee access, and authorization boundaries are reviewed together.
OpenAI can change program details and model names quickly. This guide was checked against official OpenAI sources on August 21, 2026. The application form, Help Center, and OpenAI policies remain the authoritative sources.
Trusted Access for Cyber is the governance and access layer for OpenAI Daybreak.
Approval is not automatic; identity, trust, risk, and use case are evaluated.
Blue is the starting point for most defenders; Red is for advanced authorized testing.
Enterprise TAC access cannot be resold or extended to external customers.
OpenAI describes Trusted Access for Cyber as a trust-based framework that helps verified enterprise customers and cybersecurity practitioners use advanced models more effectively for authorized security work. Daybreak Access is the current program name.
The goal is not to remove every safeguard. It is to pair more precise safeguards with verification, scope controls, and oversight so legitimate defenders face less unnecessary friction while OpenAI policies and safety controls remain in force.
OpenAI currently exposes two paths: individuals can request access through chatgpt.com/cyber, while organizations use the enterprise Trusted Access application.
The enterprise form asks about legal entity identity, contacts, security governance, access controls, and the environments where the models will be used. Teams seeking organization-wide access should evaluate the enterprise path rather than treating individual verification as a substitute.
| Topic | Individual path | Enterprise path |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | chatgpt.com/cyber | OpenAI enterprise TAC form |
| Focus | Individual identity / eligibility | Legal entity, team, controls, and use-case scope |
| Access | Approved individual scope | Approved internal users and workspaces |
| Approval | Not automatic | Not automatic |
The official form is aimed at enterprise customers and cybersecurity practitioners. It lists penetration testing, red teaming, vulnerability assessment/identification/exploitation, detection-evasion research, malware reverse engineering, cryptographic research, and threat intelligence among the intended use cases.
The core boundary is authorization: work must involve systems, applications, accounts, networks, or data you own, operate, or are explicitly authorized to test or analyze.
The form requests legal entity name, trade name, public website, government relationship, primary contact, role, department, business email and phone. It also asks about the organization’s existing OpenAI commercial relationship.
The professional-use section asks which product surfaces will be used, intended cyber use cases, every country where TAC use is planned, and the organization’s accreditations or certifications. Options include CREST, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS, and FedRAMP or equivalent.
The legal attestations focus on mature security governance. The form includes an attestation about maintaining a SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or equivalent certified security program, along with controls for identity, API keys, monitoring, incident response, and managed devices.
Only controls that actually exist should be attested to. OpenAI states that incomplete or inaccurate information can delay or prevent onboarding.
| Control area | What the form emphasizes |
|---|---|
| Identity and access | SSO, MFA, least privilege, and RBAC |
| API keys | Secure storage, rotation/revocation, service ownership, scoped permissions |
| Monitoring | Misuse monitoring and sufficient model-use logging where feasible and lawful |
| Incident response | Documented process for account compromise or abuse |
| Organization identity | Dedicated TAC organization ID if requested and domain-specific email |
| Endpoints | Disk encryption, patching, endpoint protection, and endpoint management |
According to the current OpenAI Help Center, Daybreak Blue is built on GPT-5.6 Sol and is the recommended starting point for most security teams. It targets defensive workflows such as vulnerability triage, secure code review, malware analysis, detection engineering, incident response, and patch validation.
Daybreak Red uses GPT-5.6 Cyber and is designed for advanced, explicitly authorized penetration testing, red teaming, exploit validation or development, and controlled vulnerability research. It requires separate approval and stronger verification and access controls.
| Access | Current model / alias | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Daybreak Blue | GPT-5.6 Sol / gpt-daybreak-blue | Defense, triage, secure code review, incident response, patch validation |
| Daybreak Red | GPT-5.6 Cyber / gpt-daybreak-red | Authorized pentest, red team, exploit validation/development, controlled research |
The enterprise form separately lists Codex with Sign in with ChatGPT, Codex through the OpenAI API, and use in the organization’s own application through the API. It also asks whether the applicant is interested in OpenAI cyber models through AWS and authorizes sharing necessary contact and approval information with AWS.
The actual path depends on the approved organization, workspace, project, model, and product surface. OpenAI recommends a workspace or organization reserved for internal security work rather than one that also powers customer-facing traffic.
Approval can enable the models and product surfaces specified for the account with more precise safeguards for authorized cyber work. It does not mean every safeguard disappears or every specialized model becomes available automatically.
Official documentation states that TAC does not provide Zero Data Retention by default, does not permit resale/proxying/embedding for external customers, and does not authorize testing systems you do not own or have explicit permission to assess.
OpenAI provides a Turkish-language enterprise application, and the form asks applicants to list every country in which they intend to use OpenAI services under TAC. This shows that usage geography is part of the review.
However, the public application and overview do not publish a universal country allowlist. It would therefore be inaccurate to treat access from Türkiye or any other country as automatic; organizations should provide truthful country and use-case information.
Before applying, confirm that the submitter can act for the legal entity, that use cases are concrete and authorized, and that every selected security control is actually implemented. Separating customer-facing product traffic from internal security work is also important.
It is the governance and access model for OpenAI Daybreak, intended to help verified organizations and practitioners perform authorized cybersecurity work with appropriate model access.
No. OpenAI reviews applications and evaluates identity, trust, risk, intended use, and other factors.
The enterprise form includes an attestation concerning a SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or equivalent certified security program and also asks about existing certifications. Applicants should only attest to controls they truthfully meet.
No. Blue is the starting point for most defensive workflows. Red is for advanced, explicitly authorized testing and requires separate approval.
No. Official documentation limits TAC to approved internal users and does not permit extending it to external customers or third parties.
No. Availability of the localized form is not an automatic country or organization approval. Countries of intended use are explicitly requested and OpenAI performs a review.
No. OpenAI states that Trusted Access and Zero Data Retention are separate.
This page does not apply, approve, or guarantee access on behalf of OpenAI. It explains the official requirements in plain language and helps teams plan internal security readiness.